https://soundcloud.com/kefny/writing-for-moby-nahorna-bay/s-DXQJdn2vo0j?si=5ca04e758226401385971259eddca08b&utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing
Category: Uncategorised
the un-frame of outside
List of works related to music and walking, or walking music.

Hammons from “Going Out” anthology book and the buddha quoted by Derek Jarman in his memoirs “Modern Nature”
Hammons recognised the diversity and flow of public space as creative inspiration, as creativity. “The less I do the more of an artist I am”. A simple manifesto that suggests much without filling the observer with long words, words encoded with the possesive nature of logistics.
I read three essays in “Going Out: Walking, Listening, Soundmaking”, an anthology of walking related practices. 150 pages. Reading is a kind of movement, a motion, so it would not be fair to ridicule the corporeal paradox of sitting and reading a book about walking which may not be a negative paradox. However the logistics of an anthology tries to gather patterns from a diverse array of creative practices, to categorise, and to assimilate these practices into a dominant language.
Another quote from Hammons: “The art audience is the worst audience in the world. It’s overly educated, it’s conservative, it’s put to criticism, not to understand and it never has any fun! Why should I spend my time playing to that audience? That’s like going into the lion’s den. So I refuse to deal with that audience. I will play with the street audience. That audience is much more human, and their opinion is from the heart. They don’t have any reason to play games, there is nothing gained or lost.”
Criticism: an assertion of bourgeious elitism? Fred Moten writes in “The Undercommons”: “Critical theory neglects the possibility of there being an outside, an untameable…” The relation beteen the critique and the outside. What is outside of the critique? How can we imagine outside as a sort of unframing, outside of logic? And walking as an evaporation of logic, of verbalism. Evaporation: context leaves through the pores, the self empties, the wind rattles through us. Wanting to feel in this way would be dangerous in a rotting landscape full of grief and violence. But then to smell the gorse on an empty stomach is beautiful and intense. Digestion: swallow some words, walk them out, test them in their relations to the thick spatial experience of an environment, stick them to the lands and leave them hanging on trees and motors, take a shit and the opened hollow will birth a new idea, not yours, but one made in space.
Notes now on “The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning and Black Study” by Fred Moten and Stefano Harney.




In moten and Harney’s framework of the colonial dynamic, the settler does not surround the exploited but is surrounded. The settler attacks outwardly, transforming heterogeneity into homogeneity and defines the commons. In this framework, why repair and why fight for visibility? Why fight for the commons? Rather then defend our commons, can we inhabit the outside, the space unframed by those categories and logics defined by the settler?
What is looming outside of every attempt to politicise?
There is resonance here between Moten and Harney’s commons and Hammon’s art world. They both desire to looks beyond the critique. The critique may be the tool of a rationalising order, to tame whatever’s left outside.
So how to inhabit the outside, close to chaos? This call may be beyond politics that may be already encapsulated by an order codified in hierarchy and domination. A call to bring life into intensity, to imagine chaose as a source of intensity.
Nonmovement of everyday life





Final notes on Brandon La Belle’s “Sonic Agency”.
La Belle’s last chapter of his book, titled “The Weak”.
La Belle is outlining a politics of vulnerability and weakness, a “passionate politics” (hooks) held in spaces where our deep longings and desires are shared as a process of building community. Relating to bell hook’s work on critical education, the classroom represents this potential space to carry and educate methods of collectivising. Rather than an imposition of determined knowledge, a classroom of “enagaged pedagogy” becomes a space enriched with “the commonality of feeling”, an embodied present reflecting the thickness of social tensions and connections of everyday life. Through feeling together, the subjectivity of knowledge is displayed through living bodies. hooks’ classroom is a space in continuous flux, shifting with the present moods and dynamics of the students and teachers. The engaged classroom reflects a politics free from the subtractive qualities of the “campaign”: instead as fluid as the “nonmovements of everyday life”.
Back to La Belle’s words, these places of learning can function as “shared spaces of (erotic) becoming, sites of desire and longing, bridges between private and public life.”
La Belle’s expanding view of agency goes beyond, or before politics. He echoes Herbert Marcuse’s call for an “emergence of a new historical subject”, calling for a political subjectivity beyond ideology, a transformation of the self that goes “against the prevailing technological reasoning of our times. It is this technological reasoning of ideology that La Belle claims to reduce “the creativity of our speech, to an overarching functionality, restricting the full dimensionality of discourse.” (pg 133).
This possibility of self-transformation opens an expanding view of political subjectivity, one that is “expressed not solely in gestures of speaking up, or in rational formations of energetic attunement, ecstatic togetherness, and affective intervention – vibrational formations in which the personal is deepy political and the political is something to be shared.”
La Belle is outlining a potential bridge between the fuzzy realms of the spiritual and the rationalism of politics, that to be together as a “vibrational formation”, connecting as much through non-verbal energetic becoming as speech and ideology, is a continued expression of our political subjectivity. In this framework, subjectivity does not start and end with a ‘campaign’, but is continously emerging from our embodied interactions as individuals or collectives. Connection, joy and togetherness are seen as powerful political actions against systems that rank, divide, and alienate individuals. Perhaps to avoid the rationalisation of these ecstatic human qualities of togetherness, La Belle makes a claim for this subjectivity to be “beyond the purely political”, and refers to Václav Havel’s term the “pre-politcal”, which he describes as the “fundamental responsibility of a life lived with others, that overrides party politics.”
“in being weak, one is in need of others.”
unlearning
unlearning great
dislearning womp womp
dislearning, dis-connected to a knowing. unlearning not a return, recognising trapped energies.
there is a possibility of our dislearning, as our tools provide a constantly higher leaning away from the troublesome heart which coats the knowing. the painful heart throbs and now we can leap away in a constant flow of external spaces, virtual spaces, a stimulation peaking beyond the threshold of a sensory whole.
how to make a statement about the collective shifts from an individual perspective?
Existential Anxiety
Further notes on Vibrant Matter by Jane Bennet. Bennet suggests ways of approaching our being in order to access, even slightly, the “vibrancy” of matter, this entanglement of things that surrounds and partakes us. In regards to the opposition of this enlightenment, what is the blinding string that gathers us into self? Perhaps it is our fear of death, becoming unwhole into the ground that moves beneath us, that keeps us desperately holding ourselves together. Perhaps the fear of death is not an intention but the intrinsic motive of the body. So life is a fleeting holding on, and the illusory idea of self motivates each step to eat, to love and to breathe!
It reminds me how the existential psychotherapists say that anxiety is inherent to the human condition, or how birds and squirrels look like they’re on amphetamines! Existential anxiety.
In it’s meta version, vibrant materialism is a gentleness, a gap of ease between the everyday harshness of survival.
I’d like to make a future installation that sounds our death. As a reminder that the only certainty in our future is our death. The Buddhas say it is a good thing to know our death. That’s when the shimmering beauty of life reveals itself.




Collapse is fatigue, depression, dysfunctional relationships, transport strikes, the malnourished fox. Collapse envisioned through micropolitical and microsocial events is more real than a story of “the end of the world”. Decay brings growth. Even a speck of algae bloom is a world of it’s own, and so the worlds continue to exist.
Sound is a bridge
Sound to connect, not seperate. Listening for connection, to increase the enchantment of living; with eachother, with non-human beings and materials, with our interweaving environments.
Soundscape Composition As Global Music: Electro-Acoustic Music as Soundscape
Notes on paper by Barry Truax







Spatialised?
I am here to explore my relationship to “spatialisation”. I have some questions to explore. How is sound spatialised? How can we observe sound in space? We listen with our bodies, we observe with technology. Reflection, absorbtion, refraction. Movement and being.
How do I design space with digital softwares? I use reverb plugins to create rooms and location; I use panning and amplitude to create movement. Sound design is beyond the object itself, it includes how these objects move and interact with an environment. We are designing environments, we are architects. What is the distinction between an environment and the objects it contains?
I like my melodies to fly about and have life to them. By listening and observing my environment I can learn how things move and sound through the material world. Listening is part of the practice. The world is spatialised. Do I listen to the mechanical sounds around me and recreate them with digital technologies? For what purpose? Can I experience the natural world as an inspiration too?
I am interested in exploring quiet in spatialisation practices. The spaces between. In the sound arts community in London I experience many overwhelming performances. The body is blasted with sound from all directions. Movement that defies physics. What does it mean when we design movement and spaces that don’t exist in the material world? Many of the multichannel compositions I have heard are overwhelming in the movement of sound objects. Artists want to show the limits of these new technologies. It is spectacular. It’s called technological listening. Human’s commitment to the spectacle is now expressed through immersive art pieces. Where will we go from here? Sometimes immersivity with new technologies feels like disembodiement. I am disappointed by the 8 channel spectacular compositions. We accelerate into oblivion. I’m eager to explore technological listening and the ethical debates around it.
I’m scared. I believe we need embodiement to access our empathy and love for eachother, for the environments that sustain us and the non-humans we share life with. Life is such a gift!
I imagine spatialised sound composition as a social experience. Humans gather together and listen to sound. I will share a drawing of an event I was running in the summer with friends. Humans bring different sound devices and participate in the sound system.


I feel urgency. I want my practice to tackle issues such as social alienation and disconnection with our environment. For now I am not interested in working with multi channel equipment as I don’t think it is accessible to most people.
Perhaps I will focus on expanding the radio setup. Maybe we can build a software that makes local broadcasting easy with little equipment.
Perhaps I will learn more about group vocalisation practices. The body is surely the best place to start!
Before making such big statements I have a lot to learn.
Quantum Listening
Notes on “Quantum Listening”; a recently published book containing a speech by Pauline Oliveros from 1999.
I could recite the whole text as a list of important quotes. I feel Deep Resonance with Oliveros’ philosophy.
Quantum listening is about listening in multiple ways, as many ways, to existence, being, surrounding, soundscape. To Oliveros, the multiplicity of listening is essential. Listening is not the ear as an objective reciever getting closer to an external reality. It is an observation of the cascading reactions to the external, internal and imagined sounds of being. Through observation the sounds themselves change. Like in quantum physics, Oliveros claims that observation changes reality.
“Quantum Listening is listening in as many ways as possible simultaneously – changing and being changed by the listening.”
“One focuses on a point and changes that point by listening.”
Pauline is fascinated by the potentials of new technologies. To her, new biotech such as ingested nanotechnology could assist in our hearing abilities. “What would you want to hear if you had a bionic ear that could let you listen to anything, anywhere, any time?” She is imagining a technology that gives us live access to microsopic sounds, like the sound of a cell dividing in our body, or macroscopic sounds, like the gasses in deep space. Someone deeply imbedded in the somatic practices of Qi Gong and Tai Chi, and the awareness practices in Buddhist cultures, who carried out most of her retreats in natural environments, is excited about the hybridization of human and machine. What would Oliveros say today?
TikTok is like our bionic ear. We have access to the larger world in rapid time. A global culture connected through sound and moving image. Here is a lovely quote from Adam Greenfield: ““In our time, even the most seemingly transgressive visions of technology in everyday life invariably fall back to the familiar furniture of capital investment, surplus extraction and exploitation. We don’t even speak of progress any longer, but rather of ‘innovation.’”
Is Pauline excited or rather, aware of the inevitable. “Soon we will be faced with an unprecedented, exponential acceleration in technology.” And here we are. My deep admiration for Oliveros is her fascination with the new worlds and the future, as someone who embodies ancestral knowledge. It takes courage to carry both. It takes wisdom to understand nuance and complexity. For her we must recognize the implications and potentialities of new technologies. The human-machine epoch has already begun.
I am imagining how to implement the digital into my compositional work. How does the digital dimension overlay our perception? My recent compositional work and that for my final project discusses perception, and music as perception. I wonder how music can respresent states of being and also attract one to the materiality around them. The entity that calling out to us is also within. This is a reaction to the common function of popular music today, as a seperation from the world. What is the world, if it does not include the audio from our earbuds? More accurate language is necessary.
This project I am currently involved in, of music as perception, melodies above field recordings, music that exists within a space, outdoor music: what ideologies are present in these respresentations? Perhaps it began as a purism, of the’natural’ world as something to return to. Throughout the course and after reading Seth Kim Cohen’s book, ‘In The Blink of an Ear’, I imagine this purism as an essentialism. A nostalgia for better times, that we never experienced. Today, new technologies are imbedded in our perception. How can these be incorporated into the composition. In my new composition, I represent the digital (or the elsewhere-ness of the digital) as a sine wave, slightly irritated and distorted, but able to navigate with the environment. For now. It doesn’t consume the heart melody.
Performance
The next assignment went over my head as I have been busy in other activities. I often have the feeling that I am not studying enough while also learning much outside of the coursework. I want to allocate more time for study and research to gain more from the course.
I thought I would discuss some other elements of my practice. Recently I have been performing regularly and have had some interesting realisations around my work. I play live electronic music, often in dance settings, with music that could be described as euphoric, wholesome and hyperfolk-ish. Other buzzy words are oaty jigs, celtic hardcore and cute music. I’ve felt by describing my music in terms that stand out and perplex people is effective in giving homage to my unique sound and vision. It also makes people curious and wanting to come to an event. Until recently I would give more open terms like electronic or ambient, which do not tend to excite people. Being humble is attractive but is it a powerful agent of our times? I like more the idea of creating excitement and positivity around the work. I would even claim that fake humility is prevelant in some electronic music genres that are male dominated. So my agenda is to do homage to my work by imagining that others could benefit from listening. There is clearly ego here, bubbling away, as I run around meeting people, but I believe that is neccessary for carving out the space and platform that I want for my music. It is a tender juggling process to not get consumed in an individualist mindset.
Buzzy buzzy. After performing I have feelings of emptyness and sadness. I wonder what really happened, did I say what I wanted to say?
The pace is so fast that I have little time to prepare a set. I only use a launchpad and my laptop so there is a reduced space for expression. I realised I want to step back from performing and implement more tools of expression to make the performance more live. Also, after a recent set the sound was so distorted, and my vision was not shared with the audience. I have a lot of work to do in sound design and mixing to handle bigger sound systems.
A few days ago I played in Iklectik in the garden space. I really ejoyed playing outside.
Now with some friends we are planning outdoor events. With a portable stereo system and radio system, we have a center output of sound with different outputs dotted around, from radios and bluetooth speakers with recievers. All will be connected to a pirate radio frequency. We will set up in public spaces, with a battery since the set up is small, and invite performers and DJs to play. In our utopian vision, members of the public will dance together outside in an unexpected sound and movement experience. Performers will have an opportunity to express themselves without the restrictions of club spaces. Little money will be needed to set this up. I am thinking of the tem sonic flocking. Body body body! Sound arts needs to prioritize embodiement to harness the healing nature of sound and movement experience.
To continue the revolution folx will dismantle their phones into garden robotics to assist the new food growing communites.
My most recent performance: